What am I seeing?
Domain anchors that co-occur in indexed artifacts are connected. A heavier link means more shared artifacts.
Semantic map
Semantic anchor map
The ecosystem maps show semantic relationships, overlaps, and geographic spread based on indexed artifacts. Patterns reflect the current corpus — not a complete picture, not a ranking.
This map shows semantic relationships between domain anchors based on indexed artifacts. It is not a ranking and not a map of influence.
Experimental v1. Based on semantic aggregation tables such as anchor_relationships, organisation_anchor_profiles, and domain_anchors. The corpus is incomplete; relationships may change as more artifacts are indexed.
How do the maps work technically?
- Domain anchors are terms that serve as semantic reference points. They are extracted from artifact content via deterministic matching.
- Observed mentions are organisation names automatically recognised in artifact text. Not semantically weighted.
- Overlap arises when multiple domain anchors co-occur in the same artifact. More shared artifacts means a heavier link.
- Relation evidence is based on co-occurrence, mentions, and semantic proximity. Seed-only links are administrative, not artifact-based.
- Geography is automatically recognised from organisation descriptions. Deterministic text matching, no AI.
- All extraction is deterministic — no AI inference, no language understanding.
How to read this page
What do you see here?
What is it based on?
Organisations with a sufficiently strong anchor profile are visible as context. They are not a ranking.
How certain is it?
Missing relationships do not mean they do not exist; they have simply not been indexed yet.
What does it not mean?
No map of influence, leadership, market position, or importance. Patterns reflect the current indexed corpus.
Loading semantic map...
Domain anchor
Organisation